Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Disc ploughing, harrowing, and ridging increased soybean yield 16.12% relative to no tillage.

A claim from Conservation and conventional tillage effects on soil properties and soybean production · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc ploughing, harrowing, and ridging increased soybean yield 16.12% relative to no tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
DPHRe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
16.12%e0
Comparator
NTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over the two-year period and compared to NT, the percentage increase in yield with other tillage practices were 9.3% for CHP, 10.1% for CU, 13.7% for DP, 17.9% for DPH and 16.12% for DPHR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1451
e1

“yield of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merril)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–301

Title

Conservation and conventional tillage effects on soil properties and soybean production

AP Onwualu; IE Ahaneku Agro-Science 2004. doi:10.4314/as.v2i2.1488

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e27fc427a9a3a80f59a6aaadee47a5507f40eab1ba29085ac64fcc4125b4a871 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.