Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irradiated barley plots generally grew less than nonirradiated plots, especially at high dose.

A claim from STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON RICE, WHEAT, AND BARLEY · 1963

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated barley plots generally grew less than nonirradiated plots, especially at high dose.

Treatment
irradiated plotse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inferiore0
Qualifier
with a few exceptionse0
Comparator
nonirradiated plote0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of irradiated plots in the field, with a few exceptions, was inferior to the nonirradiated plot, especially on high dosage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–679
t0

“STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON RICE, WHEAT, AND BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62

Title

STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON RICE, WHEAT, AND BARLEY

Teng-Ying Ouang Proc. Japan Conf. Radioisotopes 1963

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e28291ee306eeb6483c62eab08a47e44cb9649fbf8b9fcc8dab7d6e6d3f47029 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

radiation · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

36 papers: 13 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.