Claim · model-written summary
GA3 had no significant influence on flowering or fruit production the next year.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeae1 - Treatment
- GA3e0
- Outcome
- flowering or fruit productione0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with GA3 and PP333 did not significantly influence flowering or fruit production in the following year.”
e1“olive trees”
Title
Effects of gibberellic acid, asparagine and glutamine on flower bud induction in olive
P. Proietti; A. Tombesi Journal of Horticultural Science 1996. doi:10.1080/14620316.1996.11515418
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Intervention effect Partial flower thinning stimulated vegetative activity.
- Intervention effect Complete blossom removal stimulated vegetative activity.
- Intervention effect July GA3 slightly increased vegetative growth in the treatment year and next year.
- Intervention effect Later GA3 treatments stimulated growth only in the following year.
- Intervention effect Asparagine stimulated growth in the following year only.
- Intervention effect Glutamine stimulated growth in the following year only.
- Intervention effect PP333 reduced plant growth the following year.
- Intervention effect Complete blossom removal strongly increased flowering in the following year.
- Intervention effect Partial blossom removal strongly increased flowering in the following year.
- Intervention effect Complete blossom removal strongly increased fruit production in the following year.
- Intervention effect Partial blossom removal strongly increased fruit production in the following year.
- Intervention effect PP333 had no significant influence on flowering or fruit production the next year.
- Intervention effect Asparagine positively affected flower bud induction without affecting production per tree.
- Intervention effect Glutamine positively affected flower bud induction without affecting production per tree.
- Intervention effect Asparagine did not affect production per tree.
- Intervention effect Glutamine did not affect production per tree.
- Mechanism The authors propose that hormonal effects on induction are mediated through assimilate availability and distribution.
- Mechanism The authors suggest that asparagine and glutamine may act as messengers in induction in relation to reserves.