Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage saved about 3.8% to 13.7% in costs.

A claim from Impact of Zero Tillage and Tillage Practice in Chickpea Production · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage saved about 3.8% to 13.7% in costs.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Zero tillage (T1)e1
Outcome
moneye0
Direction
savese0
Value
3.8% to 13.7%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although this practice (T1) saves the money about 3.8% to 13.7% and time also saves minimum 8 days for succeeding crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1546
e1

“Zero tillage (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–440
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55

Title

Impact of Zero Tillage and Tillage Practice in Chickpea Production

Md. Abdul Quddus; Habib Mahammad Naser; Md. Alamgir Siddiky; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2020. doi:10.5539/jas.v12n4p106

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e292087cce9c62619b69ac085bc9330883029524f2e97dd39e84711f8a0efcd2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer