Claim · model-written summary
Differences among Rhizobium strains were not significant.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- strainse0
- Outcome
- differences among strainse0
- Direction
- not significante0
RhizobiumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea as Influenced by Variety and Inoculation with Rhizobium Strains”
e0“However, the differences among strains were not significant.”
Title
Amare Girma http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JBAH/article/download/25638/26506/ 2015
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Association Chickpea variety substantially affected growth, nodulation, yield and yield attributes.
- Intervention effect Inoculation significantly affected plant height, nodule number and nodule dry weight.
- Intervention effect Inoculation significantly affected seed yield.
- Observation Varietal seed yield ranged from 13.3 to 24.86qha-1.
- Observation Varietal protein content ranged from 27.99 to 36.57%.
- Intervention effect Rhizobium inoculation increased seed yield by 8.34%.
- Intervention effect Rhizobium inoculation increased crude protein content by 5.36%.
- Observation Yelbe had the highest significant yield, 24.86qha-1.
- Observation Kobo yielded 22.7 qha-1, second to Yelbe.
- Observation Fetenech had the lowest yield, 13.37 qha-1.
- Observation Kobo had the highest crude protein at 36.57%.
- Observation Fetenech had 35.96% crude protein.
- Observation Yelbe had 33.12% crude protein.
- Observation Kutaye had the lowest crude protein at 27.99%.
- Recommendation The authors suggest variety choice and rhizobium inoculation may improve chickpea productivity and quality.