Claim · model-written summary
Total crowding coefficient was higher for Bd+Cp than Bd+Ct.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“The total K value for Bd+Cp was higher than Bd+Ct.”
Title
Ali Arsyadi; Abdullah Luki; Karti PDMH; et al. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 2014. doi:10.14334/jitv.v19i2.1036
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. pubescens increased B. decumbens dry matter yield by 147.9% over sole cropping.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. ternatea increased B. decumbens dry matter yield by 74.1% over sole cropping.
- Observation Land equivalent ratio was 1.04 for Bd+Ct.
- Observation Land equivalent ratio was 1.58 for Bd+Cp.
- Observation B. decumbens had a higher crowding coefficient than C. pubescens in mixed cropping.
- Observation B. decumbens had a higher crowding coefficient than C. ternatea in mixed cropping.
- Observation B. decumbens aggressivity was positive in both mixed cropping systems.
- Intervention effect Mixed cropping did not significantly increase crude protein content of B. decumbens.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with B. decumbens decreased crude protein content of C. ternatea.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. pubescens did not decrease neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre content of B. decumbens.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. ternatea did not decrease neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre content of B. decumbens.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with B. decumbens did not influence C. pubescens dry matter yield.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with B. decumbens decreased C. ternatea dry matter yield.
- Intervention effect Mixed cropping did not increase total forage dry matter yield per unit area.
- Intervention effect Mixed cropping did not increase forage nutrition contents.