Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping with B. decumbens decreased C. ternatea dry matter yield.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Mixed cropping with B. decumbens did not influence DM yield of C. pubescens and decreased DM yield and CP content of C..ternatea.”
Title
Ali Arsyadi; Abdullah Luki; Karti PDMH; et al. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 2014. doi:10.14334/jitv.v19i2.1036
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. pubescens increased B. decumbens dry matter yield by 147.9% over sole cropping.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. ternatea increased B. decumbens dry matter yield by 74.1% over sole cropping.
- Observation Land equivalent ratio was 1.04 for Bd+Ct.
- Observation Land equivalent ratio was 1.58 for Bd+Cp.
- Observation B. decumbens had a higher crowding coefficient than C. pubescens in mixed cropping.
- Observation B. decumbens had a higher crowding coefficient than C. ternatea in mixed cropping.
- Observation Total crowding coefficient was higher for Bd+Cp than Bd+Ct.
- Observation B. decumbens aggressivity was positive in both mixed cropping systems.
- Intervention effect Mixed cropping did not significantly increase crude protein content of B. decumbens.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with B. decumbens decreased crude protein content of C. ternatea.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. pubescens did not decrease neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre content of B. decumbens.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with C. ternatea did not decrease neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre content of B. decumbens.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with B. decumbens did not influence C. pubescens dry matter yield.
- Intervention effect Mixed cropping did not increase total forage dry matter yield per unit area.
- Intervention effect Mixed cropping did not increase forage nutrition contents.