Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Neem extract gave the lowest botanical-treatment larvae populations.

A claim from Efficacy of Botanical and Synthetic Insecticides in field conditions for the management of Cabbage Insect Pests at District Dadu, Sindh · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem extract gave the lowest botanical-treatment larvae populations.

Treatment
Neem leaf extracte0
Interactor
larvale0pest
Outcome
larval populatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.18 and 1.04 larvae leaf-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98
e0

“Neem leaf extract was the most effective, with the lowest larval population (1.18 and 1.04 larvae leaf-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1202

Title

Efficacy of Botanical and Synthetic Insecticides in field conditions for the management of Cabbage Insect Pests at District Dadu, Sindh

Sanyal; Muhammad Asad; Muhammad Sajid; et al. Physical Education Health and Social Sciences 2025. doi:10.63163/jpehss.v3i1.217

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e3537ef917c1e665e9fe6b05661caa252500211225f38ed1cf4c92e7c4e6686e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Azadirachta indica · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 65 positive, 13 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.