Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Crop rotation did not affect soil ammonium, extractable phosphorus or penetration resistance.

A claim from Wheat Production, Weed Population and Soil Properties Subsequent to 20 Years of Sod as Affected by Crop Rotation and Tillage · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation did not affect soil ammonium, extractable phosphorus or penetration resistance.

Treatment
crop rotatione0
Outcome
Ammonium-N, extractable P and penetration resistance (PR)e0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium-N, extractable P and penetration resistance (PR) of soil were not affected by crop rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1029

Title

Wheat Production, Weed Population and Soil Properties Subsequent to 20 Years of Sod as Affected by Crop Rotation and Tillage

M. A. Arshad; K. S. Gill; R. C. Izaurralde Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 1998. doi:10.1300/j064v12n02_10

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e3816dfdd5dfc6b2ed77d85fd79ef38875b95292e65d90e5c8fce0f7aa9b3700 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

rotation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 20 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.