Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fluid drilling was usually inferior to dry seeding for stand establishment with August seeding dates.

A claim from Comparison of Fluid Drilling with Conventional Planting Methods for Stand Establishment and Yield of Spring and Fall Broccoli Crops · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluid drilling was usually inferior to dry seeding for stand establishment with August seeding dates.

Treatment
Fluid drillinge2
Outcome
stand establishmente2
Direction
inferiore2
Comparator
dry seedinge2
Setting
August seeding datese2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring and Fall Broccoli Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131
e2

“Fluid drilling usually was inferior to dry seeding for stand establishment with August seeding dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–578

Title

Comparison of Fluid Drilling with Conventional Planting Methods for Stand Establishment and Yield of Spring and Fall Broccoli Crops

Brian A. Kahn; James E. Motes Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1988. doi:10.21273/jashs.113.5.670

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e38867e44ac5754a50f6e9d08d4af9d98f7521411c41258ff7dfc48a92949096 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

transplanting · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.