Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying tomato transplant roots with a spore suspension reduced galls by 35% at 28 days.

A claim from Biological Control of Meloidogyne hapla on Alfalfa and Tomato with the Fungus Meria coniospora. · 1989

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying tomato transplant roots with a spore suspension reduced galls by 35% at 28 days.

Treatment
sprayed with a spore suspensione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplae2pest
Second interactor
M. coniosporaDrechmeria coniosporae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
gallse0
Direction
fewere0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
roots not treated with funguse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When roots of tomato transplants were dusted with M. coniospora fungus-rye powder or sprayed with a spore suspension before planting in M. hapla-infested soil, 42% and 35%, respectively, fewer galls developed in 28 days on treated roots than on roots not treated with fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–1012
e2

“root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla on alfalfa and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–171

Title

Biological Control of Meloidogyne hapla on Alfalfa and Tomato with the Fungus Meria coniospora.

J L Townshend; M Meskine; G L Barron PubMed 1989

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e3899aa166bb1c248f2c599aa407e6bae73e418af863de25840b1ffefb3c4f72 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

application · Meloidogyne hapla · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.