Claim · model-written summary
The authors selected StPt because it represented pastures thoroughly and was easy to use.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Verbatim
e0“StPt was selected due to its thorough representation of the pastures and ease of use.”
Title
Laura Beth Kenny; Daniel Ward; Mark G Robson; et al. Journal of Animal Science 2018. doi:10.1093/jas/sky111
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Method / resource The techniques did not differ in detecting creeping bentgrass.
- Method / resource The techniques did not differ in detecting orchardgrass.
- Method / resource Methods differed in detecting Kentucky bluegrass.
- Method / resource Methods differed in detecting tall fescue.
- Method / resource Methods differed in detecting other.
- Method / resource Method repeatability declined as species prevalence increased.
- Method / resource Five of 30 method pairs showed significant overall bias, including three LPI 3-50 versus EPED pairs.
- Method / resource LPI 3-50 and LPI 5-30 agreed perfectly in prevalence and bias.
- Method / resource StPt and EPED agreed perfectly in prevalence and bias.
- Method / resource LPI 3-50 and EPED were the most dissimilar techniques.