Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Kernel weight and kernels per spike of winter wheat decreased with increasing spring plant density.

A claim from Response of Winter Wheat to Simulated Stand Reduction · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel weight and kernels per spike of winter wheat decreased with increasing spring plant density.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing spring plant densitye6
Outcome
kernel weight and kernels spike −1e6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Winter Wheat to Simulated Stand Reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53
e6

“kernel weight and kernels spike −1 decreased with increasing spring plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1182

Title

Response of Winter Wheat to Simulated Stand Reduction

Douglas L. Holen; Philip L. Bruckner; John M. Martin; et al. Agronomy Journal 2001. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.932364x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e3c166d75da2240cea7c8518ec8b8cc503f506a1dad5fd3ea2c7c59b3d76af69 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this claim · 375 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.