Claim · model-written summary
DI2 yield did not differ significantly from flooded irrigation.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- DI2 treatmente0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- not significantly differente0
- Comparator
- flood-irrigated treatmente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa)”
e0“yield in the DI2 treatment was not significantly different than that in the flood-irrigated treatment”
Title
H.B. He; R. Yang; L.Q. Wu; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2016. doi:10.1111/aab.12267
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Non-flooded irrigation raised early root length density, leaf and shoot dry weights, and root activity relative to flooded irrigation.
- Intervention effect Non-flooded irrigation limited rice growth and development after jointing.
- Intervention effect Non-flooded irrigation produced lower grain yield than flooded cultivation.
- Observation DI2 produced the highest grain yield among drip regimes.
- Observation DI2 produced the highest water use efficiency among drip regimes.
- Intervention effect DI2 water use efficiency was 2.5 times that of flooded irrigation.
- Recommendation Drip irrigation is proposed as a water-saving rice cultivation practice in arid regions.