Claim · model-written summary
In naked oats under stress, the trapped energy and electronic transport flows were controlled by one and the same factor.
- Taxon
- oats
Avena sativae0 - Material
- naked oate3
- Treatment
- stresse3
- Outcome
- flows of trapped energy (TR0/RC) and electronic transport (ET0/RC)e3
- Qualifier
- by one and the same factore3
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“husked oats (A. sativa subsp. sativa) and naked oats (A. sativa subsp. nudisativa)”
e3“The flows of trapped energy (TR0/RC) and electronic transport (ET0/RC) were controlled in naked oat by one and the same factor under stress and by two different factors in the absence of stress, whereas those in husked genotypes were by one factor in the absence of stress and by two different factors under stress”
Title
Changes in Organization of Activity of Photosystem II in Oat Leaves under Osmotic Stress
S. A. Churakova; E. M. Lisitsyn; G. A. Batalova Russian Agricultural Sciences 2023. doi:10.3103/s106836742306006x
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Observation In husked oats under control conditions, four main factors explained 94.2% of the variability of the assessed fluorescence parameters.
- Observation In husked oats under stress, four main factors explained 91.4% of the variability of the assessed fluorescence parameters.
- Observation In naked oats without stress, three principal factors explained 90.5% of the variability.
- Observation In naked oats under stress, four factors explained 97.1% of the variability.
- Observation In naked oats without stress, the trapped energy and electronic transport flows were controlled by two different factors.
- Observation In husked oats without stress, the trapped energy and electronic transport flows were controlled by one factor.
- Observation In husked oats under stress, the trapped energy and electronic transport flows were controlled by two different factors.
- Intervention effect Osmotic stress shifted control of the adsorbed and trapped energy flows in husked oats from one factor to two factors.
- Intervention effect Osmotic stress did not change control of the adsorbed and trapped energy flows in naked oats.
- Observation The efficiency of electron transfer to the primary acceptors of photosystem I (δRE) was controlled by two different factors whose effect was enhanced (factor loading 0.564 to 0.74).
- Observation Under stress, δRE weakened the effect of both factors in naked oat genotypes (factor loadings –0.625 and ‒0.705).
- Observation Under stress, δRE reduced the effect of one factor and strengthened the second factor in husked oat genotypes (factor loadings –0.552 and 0.687).