Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shepody root dry weight did not respond to PsJN inoculation.

A claim from A gnotobiotic bioassay for studying interactions between potatoes and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shepody root dry weight did not respond to PsJN inoculation.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Material
Shepodye0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Interactor
strain PsJNe1other
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight, a five- to eight-fold increase, two- to three-fold increase, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832
e1

“growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618

Title

A gnotobiotic bioassay for studying interactions between potatoes and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Kenneth L. Conn; George Lazarovits; Jerzy Nowak Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1997. doi:10.1139/m97-117

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e44eec2744a89af3e22d8f4270d249312b401e971003f1230f9d5b3a05195681 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 82 positive, 22 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.