Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Both barley cultivars had highest yield under conventional tillage and lowest yield under herbicide and reduced tillage.

A claim from Effect of Long-term Reduced Tillage on Yield and Weeds of Spring Barley · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both barley cultivars had highest yield under conventional tillage and lowest yield under herbicide and reduced tillage.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
yield of both cultivarse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
HT and RT tillage systemse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the yield of both cultivars was the highest in CT and the lowest in HT and RT tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–463
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71

Title

Effect of Long-term Reduced Tillage on Yield and Weeds of Spring Barley

Andrzej Woźniak; Cezary A. Kwiatkowski Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2013

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e45dc5bee12d0e0d3af2d3e668028a80795d9ff482245fe8d77e2e76b5550553 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.