Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grass amendment alone did not reduce Ralstonia.

A claim from Biological Soil Disinfestation (BSD), a new control method for potato brown rot, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2 · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass amendment alone did not reduce Ralstonia.

Treatment
grass amendment onlye0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
R. solanacearum populationse0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with grass amendment only or covering with only plastic did not result in anaerobic conditions and did not decrease R. solanacearum populations during the experimental period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1734
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69

Title

Biological Soil Disinfestation (BSD), a new control method for potato brown rot, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2

Nevein A. S. Messiha; Anne D. van Diepeningen; Marcel Wenneker; et al. European Journal of Plant Pathology 2007. doi:10.1007/s10658-007-9109-9

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e46a28008b43365708ca4f179d7682154b3a167e8014a1b0b659919fca409e02 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

other · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.