Claim · model-written summary
Selection 06 had the lowest yield to pruning weight ratios.
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Barbera Grapevine”
e0“the lowest yield:pruning weight ratios”
e1“Selection 06 was distinctive”
Title
Matthew W. Fidelibus; L. Peter Christensen; Deborah A. Golino; et al. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2009. doi:10.5344/ajev.2009.60.4.533
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation Selection 02 had fruit composition and yield similar to other selections.
- Observation Selection 02 berries were 10 to 25% heavier than others.
- Mechanism Large berries made Selection 02 clusters excessively compact.
- Observation Sour rot incidence in FPS 02 was sometimes two to three times that of other selections.
- Observation Selections 03 and 05 performed identically.
- Observation Selections 03 and 05 had fruit composition similar to several other selections.
- Observation Selections 03 and 05 had among the highest yields.
- Observation Selections 03 and 05 were moderately susceptible to sour rot.
- Observation Selection 04 was generally similar to 03 and 05.
- Observation Selection 04 had lower yields in two of four years.
- Observation Selection 06 was generally earliest ripening.
- Observation Selection 06 had the smallest berries.
- Observation Selection 06 had the lowest yields.
- Observation Selection 06 was least susceptible to sour rot.