Paper · 2009 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Yield Components and Fruit Composition of Five Barbera Grapevine Selections in the San Joaquin Valley, California

Matthew W. Fidelibus; L. Peter Christensen; Deborah A. Golino; et al.

15
claims
36
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Barbera grapevine (Vitis vinifera) selections from Foundation Plant Services (FPS), University of California, Davis, were evaluated in Parlier, Fresno County, California. Green potted plants of Barbera, FPS selections 02, 03, 04, 05, and 06, were planted in the summer of 2000, and fruit yield and quality were assessed annually between 2003 and 2006. Selection 02 performed similarly to several other selections with respect to fruit composition and yield, but its berries were 10 to 25% heavier than the others. Large berries made the clusters of FPS 02 excessively compact; the incidence of sour rot was sometimes two to three times higher for FPS 02 than for other selections. Selections 03 and 05 originated from the same mother vine and performed identically. Their fruit composition was similar to several other selections, but they had the highest, or among the highest, yield of the selections tested and were moderately susceptible to sour rot. Selection 04 was generally similar to selections 03 and 05 except that 04 had lower yields in two of the four years tested. Selection 06 was distinctive in that it was generally the earliest ripening, had the smallest berries, the lowest yields, the lowest yield:pruning weight ratios, and was the least susceptible to sour rot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 02 had fruit composition and yield similar to other selections.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 02e0
Outcome
fruit composition and yielde0
Comparator
several other selectionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Selection 02 performed similarly to several other selections with respect to fruit composition and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 02 berries were 10 to 25% heavier than others.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 02e1
Organ / stage
berriese0
Outcome
berriese0
Direction
heaviere0
Value
10 to 25%e0
Comparator
the otherse0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“its berries were 10 to 25% heavier than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selection 02 performed similarly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–384 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large berries made Selection 02 clusters excessively compact.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
FPS 02e0
Organ / stage
clusterse0
Outcome
clusters of FPS 02 excessively compacte0
Qualifier
Large berriese0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Large berries made the clusters of FPS 02 excessively compact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–575 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour rot incidence in FPS 02 was sometimes two to three times that of other selections.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
FPS 02e0
Outcome
incidence of sour rote0
Direction
highere0
Value
two to three timese0
Comparator
other selectionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the incidence of sour rot was sometimes two to three times higher for FPS 02 than for other selections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selections 03 and 05 performed identically.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selections 03 and 05e0
Outcome
performed identicallye0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Selections 03 and 05 originated from the same mother vine and performed identically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–764 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selections 03 and 05 had fruit composition similar to several other selections.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selections 03 and 05e1
Outcome
fruit compositione0
Comparator
several other selectionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Their fruit composition was similar to several other selections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selections 03 and 05 originated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–712 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selections 03 and 05 had among the highest yields.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selections 03 and 05e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
selections testede0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Selections 03 and 05 originated from the same mother vine and performed identically. Their fruit composition was similar to several other selections, but they had the highest, or among the highest, yield of the selections tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selections 03 and 05 were moderately susceptible to sour rot.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selections 03 and 05e0
Outcome
moderately susceptible to sour rote0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Selections 03 and 05 originated from the same mother vine and performed identically. Their fruit composition was similar to several other selections, but they had the highest, or among the highest, yield of the selections tested and were moderately susceptible to sour rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–953 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 04 was generally similar to 03 and 05.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 04e0
Outcome
generally similare0
Comparator
selections 03 and 05e0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Selection 04 was generally similar to selections 03 and 05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 04 had lower yields in two of four years.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
04e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
two of the four years testede0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“04 had lower yields in two of the four years tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1077 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 06 was generally earliest ripening.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 06e0
Outcome
earliest ripeninge0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Selection 06 was distinctive in that it was generally the earliest ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 06 had the smallest berries.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 06e1
Outcome
smallest berriese0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“had the smallest berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selection 06 was distinctive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 06 had the lowest yields.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 06e1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selection 06 was distinctive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 06 had the lowest yield to pruning weight ratios.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 06e1
Outcome
yield:pruning weight ratiose0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest yield:pruning weight ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selection 06 was distinctive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 06 was least susceptible to sour rot.

Taxon
Barbera Grapevinet0
Material
Selection 06e1
Outcome
least susceptible to sour rote0

Verbatim

t0

“Barbera Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the least susceptible to sour rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selection 06 was distinctive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1107 · show in text ↑