Claim · model-written summary
With no weed control, N application reduced grains per row by 48%.
- Treatment
- N applicatione0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- grains per rowe0
- Direction
- reductionse0
- Value
- 48%e0
- Comparator
- no weed controle0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Under no weed control, N application increased weed biomass by ∼58%, which resulted in reductions of 57% in leaf area index, 6.9% in rows per cob, 48% in grains per row, and 18.7% in grain weight.”
t0“maize”
Title
Henrique Rasera Raniro; Francielli Oliveira; João Otávio Araujo; et al. Farming System 2023. doi:10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100047
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect With no weed control, N application increased weed biomass by about 58%.
- Intervention effect With no weed control, N application reduced maize leaf area index by 57%.
- Intervention effect With no weed control, N application reduced rows per cob by 6.9%.
- Intervention effect With no weed control, N application reduced grain weight by 18.7%.
- Intervention effect NS+WC+ yielded 8216 kg ha−1, 66% higher than NS+WC− at 2797.3 kg ha−1.
- Recommendation In fertilized maize areas, weed control should be prioritized.