Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No pruning raised total root yield by 35.8% over debranching and 41.6% over cutback.

A claim from Effect of Spacing and Pruning Methods on Root Yield and Yield Parameters of Cassava (Mahinot esculenta Crantz) in Fedis District, East Harerghe Zone, Ethiopia · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No pruning raised total root yield by 35.8% over debranching and 41.6% over cutback.

Treatment
no pruninge0
Outcome
total root yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
35.8 and 41.6%e0
Comparator
debranching and cutbacke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava with no pruning provided the highest marketable and total root yield by about 39.3 and 44.7%, 35.8 and 41.6% over cassava with debranching and cutback, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1796

Title

Effect of Spacing and Pruning Methods on Root Yield and Yield Parameters of Cassava (Mahinot esculenta Crantz) in Fedis District, East Harerghe Zone, Ethiopia

Gebisa Benti; Fikadu Tadesse; Gezu Degefa; et al. Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research 2022. doi:10.9734/ajahr/2022/v9i130134

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e4acef598b09b21806b979ca45ddf23b8b2a5871e18ff2b7880215950fce26cc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.