Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same mixture decreased root hair infection after race 1 inoculation.

A claim from SILICA SLAG AND BARK SLAG INFLUENCE INFECTION OF PLASMODIOPHORA BRASSICA INFECTIONIN AN INTENSIVE CHINESE CABBAGE PRODUCTION SYSTEM. · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same mixture decreased root hair infection after race 1 inoculation.

Treatment
3 gram slaked lime +1 gram KC1 +1.78 gram ammonium sulfate + 1 gram calcium superphosphatee0
Interactor
race 1e0pathogen
Outcome
infection root haire0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 3 gram slaked lime +1 gram KC1 +1.78 gram ammonium sulfate + 1 gram calcium superphosphate at 500 gram soil 2 month after transplanting increased dry wight of cabbage and decreased infection root hair followed by inoculation of race 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–658

Title

SILICA SLAG AND BARK SLAG INFLUENCE INFECTION OF PLASMODIOPHORA BRASSICA INFECTIONIN AN INTENSIVE CHINESE CABBAGE PRODUCTION SYSTEM.

Loong-sheng Chang; Chun-yen Yeh; Chien-hwa Liao HortScience 1992. doi:10.21273/hortsci.27.6.607c

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e4b9d838d3157747dae43997b9008a57356e42876337bec57b6fed75f1137c29 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

calcium dihydroxide · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium sulfate · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.