Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing the seeding density no effect thousand-kernel weight.

A claim from Does root pruning increase yield and water-use efficiency of winter wheat? · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the seeding density no effect thousand-kernel weight.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing the seeding densitye0
Outcome
thousand-kernel weighte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73
e0

“Increasing the seeding density increased the number of spikes (fertile tillers), but decreased the grain yield per spike and had no effect on the thousand-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2135

Title

Does root pruning increase yield and water-use efficiency of winter wheat?

Yan Fang; Bingcheng Xu; Neil C. Turner; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2010. doi:10.1071/cp10125

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-e4c37f4befb36474131d03fecdd745709cdf40a552d64d8f620ee8eb30a72d22 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this claim · 375 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    The high-rate narrow-row combination raised grain yield 21%.

    Water Use by No‐Till Winter Wheat Influence of Seed Rate and Row Spacing · 1991 · compared with 35 kg ha −1 seeding rate and 36 cm row spacing

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.