Claim · model-written summary
Higher net returns in these clusters were due to lower input cost.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Verbatim
e1“Higher net returns were due to lower input-cost among these clusters”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Title
Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab
Balkaran Singh Sandhu; Nirmaljit Singh Dhaliwal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2019. doi:10.15740/has/ijas/15.2/297-301
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect In cluster-I, direct seeded basmati had significantly higher grain yield (54.08 q/ha) than clusters VI and II.
- Intervention effect Average grain yield of direct seeded basmati was 6.7 per cent lower than transplanted basmati.
- Intervention effect Cluster-I gave a higher net return than clusters IV, V and VI.
- Intervention effect Average net return was higher under transplanted basmati than under direct seeded basmati.
- Intervention effect Average benefit-cost ratio was higher for direct seeded basmati (2.86:1) than for transplanted basmati (2.70:1).
- Intervention effect Clusters I, III, IV and V had a higher B:C ratio under direct seeded than under transplanted basmati.
- Intervention effect Clusters II and VI had a decreased B:C ratio under direct seeded than under transplanted basmati.
- Recommendation In clusters II and VI, transplanted basmati can be preferred.
- Recommendation Direct seeded basmati is well suited to clusters I, III, IV and V.