Abstract
Farmers field demonstrations were conducted during 2015 to find out the best suitable cluster for direct seeded basmati rice in district Sri Muktsar Sahib in SW Punjab. The district was divided into six clusters and demonstrations were equally divided into these clusters. Out of the six different clusters, cluster-I (54.08 q/ha) produced significantly higher grain yield from direct seeded basmati, which was statistically at par with cluster-IV (52.25 q/ha), cluster-V (50.42 q/ha) and cluster-III (48.25 q/ha) but significantly higher from cluster-VI (44.79 q/ha) and cluster-II (43.0 q/ha). Whereas, average grain yield of direct seeded basmati was decreased by 6.7 per cent as compared to transplanted basmati. However, higher net return was obtained from cluster-I followed by cluster-IV, cluster-V and cluster-VI, but less net return was obtained in cluster-II and cluster-III under both planting methods. Higher net returns were due to lower input-cost among these clusters. Average net return was also higher under transplanted basmati from direct seeded basmati but average benefit-cost ratio was higher in direct seeded basmati (2.86:1) as compared to transplanted basmati (2.70:1). Cluster-I, cluster-III, cluster-IV and cluster-V produced higher B:C ratio under direct seeded basmati from transplanted basmati. But in cluster II and cluster VI, B:C ratio under direct seeded basmati decrease from transplanted basmati. So direct seeded basmati performed well and well suitable in cluster-I, cluster-III, cluster-IV and cluster-V and didn't perform well in cluster II and cluster VI. In these two clusters transplanted basmati can be preferred.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
In cluster-I, direct seeded basmati had significantly higher grain yield (54.08 q/ha) than clusters VI and II.
Verbatim
e0“Farmers field demonstrations were conducted during 2015 to find out the best suitable cluster for direct seeded basmati rice in district Sri Muktsar Sahib in SW Punjab”
e1“cluster-I (54.08 q/ha) produced significantly higher grain yield from direct seeded basmati”
e2“significantly higher from cluster-VI (44.79 q/ha) and cluster-II (43.0 q/ha)”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Average grain yield of direct seeded basmati was 6.7 per cent lower than transplanted basmati.
Verbatim
e3“average grain yield of direct seeded basmati was decreased by 6.7 per cent as compared to transplanted basmati”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Cluster-I gave a higher net return than clusters IV, V and VI.
Verbatim
e4“higher net return was obtained from cluster-I followed by cluster-IV, cluster-V and cluster-VI”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Average net return was higher under transplanted basmati than under direct seeded basmati.
Verbatim
e5“Average net return was also higher under transplanted basmati from direct seeded basmati”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Average benefit-cost ratio was higher for direct seeded basmati (2.86:1) than for transplanted basmati (2.70:1).
Verbatim
e6“average benefit-cost ratio was higher in direct seeded basmati (2.86:1) as compared to transplanted basmati (2.70:1)”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Clusters I, III, IV and V had a higher B:C ratio under direct seeded than under transplanted basmati.
Verbatim
e7“Cluster-I, cluster-III, cluster-IV and cluster-V produced higher B:C ratio under direct seeded basmati from transplanted basmati”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Clusters II and VI had a decreased B:C ratio under direct seeded than under transplanted basmati.
Verbatim
e1“But in cluster II and cluster VI, B:C ratio under direct seeded basmati decrease from transplanted basmati”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
In clusters II and VI, transplanted basmati can be preferred.
Verbatim
e1“In these two clusters transplanted basmati can be preferred”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct seeded basmati is well suited to clusters I, III, IV and V.
Verbatim
e1“So direct seeded basmati performed well and well suitable in cluster-I, cluster-III, cluster-IV and cluster-V”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher net returns in these clusters were due to lower input cost.
Verbatim
e1“Higher net returns were due to lower input-cost among these clusters”
t0“Impact of direct seeded rice basmati for resource conservation in Muktsar district of Punjab”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1,074 papers more in this group
See all 1,078 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.