Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wax quantity was reduced in P. vulgaris at pH 4.6.

A claim from EFFECTS OF SIMULATED ACID RAIN ON PRODUCTION, MORPHOLOGY AND COMPOSITION OF EPICUTICULAR WAX AND ON CUTICULAR MEMBRANE DEVELOPMENT · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax quantity was reduced in P. vulgaris at pH 4.6.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
rain at pH 4.6e0
Outcome
Wax quantitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wax quantity was reduced on leaves of P. vulgaris exposed to rain at pH 4.6, while wax on leaves of P. sativum and B. napus had increased numbers of smaller plates and tubes, respectively, per unit area at pH 4.6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1068

Title

EFFECTS OF SIMULATED ACID RAIN ON PRODUCTION, MORPHOLOGY AND COMPOSITION OF EPICUTICULAR WAX AND ON CUTICULAR MEMBRANE DEVELOPMENT

K. E. PERCY; E. A. BAKER New Phytologist 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb02928.x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e50d17bd7b3fec27e934bf24329db9a2f7bf10ae195c426a0d37378bd8b39495 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

ph · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
See all 7 papers →

rainfall · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.