Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Monocrop winter wheat did not result in increased net returns compared with a continuous wheat-soybean doublecrop.

A claim from Yield and Net Returns from Monocrop Winter Wheat Systems and a Winter Wheat‐Soybean Doublecrop System · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrop winter wheat did not result in increased net returns compared with a continuous wheat-soybean doublecrop.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
monoculture winter wheate1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
did not result in increasede1
Comparator
continuous winter wheat‐soybean doublecrop systeme1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Growing only monoculture winter wheat, or the absence of a soybean crop between harvest and planting of winter wheat, did not result in increased net returns vs. those obtained from a continuous winter wheat‐soybean doublecrop system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6822–7055

Title

Yield and Net Returns from Monocrop Winter Wheat Systems and a Winter Wheat‐Soybean Doublecrop System

Larry G. Heatherly; C. Dennis Elmore; Richard A. Wesley; et al. jpa 1996. doi:10.2134/jpa1996.0061

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e52a00536a4b4fc85eda778b9ed4177fb273205130b96369139ce97f51dcaacd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.