Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At lower droplet densities, ascospore germination on banana leaves was significantly lower with mancozeb than with chlorothalonil.

A claim from Relationship between the Spray Droplet Density of Two Protectant Fungicides and the Germination of Mycosphaerella fijiensis Ascospores on Banana Leaf Surfaces · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At lower droplet densities, ascospore germination on banana leaves was significantly lower with mancozeb than with chlorothalonil.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
mancozebe4
Interactor
Mycosphaerella fijiensisPseudocercospora fijiensise0pathogen
Outcome
ascospore germinatione4
Direction
lowere4
Qualifier
2–5 droplet cm-2 VMD=989 μm and 804 μm respectivelye4
Comparator
chlorothalonile4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudocercospora fijiensis
Pseudocercospora fijiensis · InteractorScot Nelson · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of fungicide spray droplet density (droplet cm-2), droplet size, and proximity of the spray droplet deposit to fungal spores was investigated with Mycosphaerella fijiensis ascospores on the banana (Musa AAA) leaf surface for two contact fungicides: chlorothalonil and mancozeb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–287
e4

“At lower droplet densities (2–5 droplet cm-2 VMD=989 μm and 804 μm respectively), ascospore germination on the mancozeb-treated leaves was significantly lower than on the chlorothalonil-treated leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1035

Title

Relationship between the Spray Droplet Density of Two Protectant Fungicides and the Germination of Mycosphaerella fijiensis Ascospores on Banana Leaf Surfaces

John R. Washington Pesticide Science 1997. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(199707)50:3<233::aid-ps562>3.3.co;2-m

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e5c8517cf96f9f1854e996b1189e9b78b56c78ca6da5bdc6e184925d4e436072 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

mancozeb · Pseudocercospora fijiensis · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.