Claim · model-written summary
The genotype × density interaction was significant for pod count and pod weight of snap bean.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Six snap bean processing cultivars were grown at 5.5, 11, and 22 plants/m 2 and harvested either by machine or by hand”
e5“Genotype × density and genotype × density × location interactions were significant for both pod count and weight”
Title
Field Plot Technique Affects Snap Bean Yield Evaluation
Gavin R. Sills; James Nienhuis Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1993. doi:10.21273/jashs.118.5.672
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association The genotype × harvest method interaction was not significant for pod count of snap bean.
- Association The genotype × harvest method interaction was significant for pod weight of snap bean.
- Mechanism The genotype × harvest method interaction for pod weight was explained by a single-degree-of-freedom contrast of genotypes for good versus poor harvestability.
- Association The genotype × density × location interaction was significant for pod count and pod weight of snap bean.
- Association The density × harvest method interaction was not significant for either yield variable of snap bean.
- Recommendation Breeders can evaluate snap bean yield of genotypes using either hand or machine harvest.
- Recommendation Snap bean plant population densities should be chosen to be appropriate to commercial production.
- Method / resource Optimum plot size for snap bean yield evaluations at these locations was estimated.