Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined PROM, PSB, VAM and PF treatment gave the maximum total and effective number of root nodules per plant in mungbean.

A claim from Effect of PROM and Microbial Inoculants on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined PROM, PSB, VAM and PF treatment gave the maximum total and effective number of root nodules per plant in mungbean.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
combined application of PROM+PSB+VAM+PFe1
Outcome
total and effective number of root nodules per plante1
Direction
maximum valuese1
Comparator
other combinations and controle1
Setting
field-laboratory experimente3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“combined application of PROM+PSB+VAM+PF reported the maximum values of most of the growth and yield attributing characters i.e. plant height, number of branches/plant, dry matter accumulation, total and effective number of root nodules per plant, fresh and dry weight of nodules per plant, crop growth rate, chlorophyll content, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, test weight, seed, straw and biological yield of mungbean as compared to other combinations and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1623
e3

“field-laboratory experiment which was conducted at agronomy farm of Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, during Kharif season of 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–818

Title

Effect of PROM and Microbial Inoculants on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

Anju Kanwar Khangarot; S.S. Yadav; Sumanth Prabhu Shyanabhoga; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2022. doi:10.18805/lr-4865

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e5e5cbd5654dc290e3a9a481268c2e104a3b0f369875edc78034d71ef7d5dd1f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Pseudomonas fluorescens · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.