Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATS foliar application raised stover yield by 13.2% over no S.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
foliar S application using ATS 10 mL/L_twicee0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
13.2%e0
Comparator
no S applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain and stover yield in foliar S application using ATS 10 mL/L_twice was 19.5% and 13.2% greater over no S application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1071
e1

“pearl millet grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–688

Title

No-Tillage with Residue Retention and Foliar Sulphur Nutrition Enhances Productivity, Mineral Biofortification and Crude Protein in Rainfed Pearl Millet under Typic Haplustepts: Elucidating the Responses Imposed on an Eight-Year Long-Term Experiment

Ankit; Ram Swaroop Bana; Kuldeep Singh Rana; et al. Plants 2022. doi:10.3390/plants11070943

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e5fc9bffba45af0807d283146e3d675fafaa2adb47cd8bc2568a16a8a95fc44b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

ammonium thiosulfate · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.