Claim · model-written summary
A 1.0 m spacing gave the best early and total yield while maintaining high fruit weight.
- Taxon
- Watermelon
Citrullus lanatust0 - Treatment
- in-row plant spacing of 1.0 me0
- Outcome
- best early and total yield while maintaining high fruit weighte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an in-row plant spacing of 1.0 m provided the best early and total yield while maintaining high fruit weight”
t0“Watermelon”
Title
Growth and Yield Response of Watermelon to in-row Plant Spacings and Mycorrhiza
Dean Ban; Smiljana Goreta Ban; Milan Oplanic; et al. Chilean journal of agricultural research 2011. doi:10.4067/s0718-58392011000400001
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Wider spacing increased vine length, leaf number and lateral branches quadratically in 2003.
- Intervention effect Wider spacing decreased early yield in 2004.
- Intervention effect Wider spacing decreased fruit number in 2003 and 2004.
- Intervention effect Wider spacing decreased total yield and fruit number in all three years.
- Intervention effect Fruit mass increased at wider spacings in 2003.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal inoculation increased vine length and lateral branch number in 2003.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal plants had higher early yield in 2005.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal plants had higher early fruit number in 2003 and 2005.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal inoculation increased total yield in 2005.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal inoculation did not affect fruit weight.
- Recommendation The authors did not recommend routine mycorrhizal inoculation because growth and yield benefits were inconsistent.