Claim · model-written summary
NILs with WT INR and lower expression inr-2 did not differ in In11 pretreatment protection.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Material
- NILse0
- Interactor
- Spodoptera exigua
Spodoptera exiguae0herbivore - Gene
- inr-2e0
- Outcome
- In11-pretreatment protectione0
- Direction
- did not show differencese0
- Comparator
- WT INRe0
Not reportedCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NILs encoding either WT INR or the lower expression inr-2 allele did not show differences in resistance to herbivory by beet armyworm ( Spodoptera exigua ), or in In11-pretreatment protection assays”
t0“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris )”
Title
Natural variation in expression of a plant immune receptor mediates elicitor sensitivity
Brian Behnken; Wesley George; Antonio F. Chaparro; et al. PLoS ONE 2026. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0343332
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Association Rapid In11 induced ethylene responses corresponded to variation at the INR locus.
- Association The In11 response phenotype corresponded to INR expression rather than coding sequence variation.
- Association INR promoter variation corresponded to In11 induced ethylene response strength across accessions and NILs.
- Association Promoter alleles corresponded to luciferase reporter activation in Nicotiana benthamiana.
- Mechanism The authors infer that cis element variation can drive leaf expression differences.
- Association NILs with WT INR and lower expression inr-2 did not differ in resistance to beet armyworm herbivory.