Claim · model-written summary
Conidial suspension and infested kernels were judged equally effective inoculants; debris was less effective.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- equally effective inoculants for FHB nurseriese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“conidial suspension and infested kernels are equally effective inoculants for FHB nurseries. Infested debris, though a natural source of inoculum, is less effective”
t0“spring wheat”
Title
A. G. Xue; G. Butler; H. D. Voldeng; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2006. doi:10.1080/07060660609507282
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Inoculation raised AUDPC and critical-time disease severity in 2002.
- Intervention effect Inoculation raised FHB index and infected spikelets in 2001 and 2002.
- Intervention effect Inoculation increased Fusarium-damaged kernels in all three years.
- Intervention effect Two inoculations produced as much FHB, FDK, and DON as three, regardless of source.
- Intervention effect Conidial suspension produced greater AUDPC, DS, FHB index, and infected spikelets than infested debris.
- Intervention effect Infested kernels produced greater AUDPC, DS, FHB index, and infected spikelets than infested debris.
- Intervention effect Conidial suspension produced greater DON content than infested debris.
- Intervention effect Infested kernels produced greater DON content than infested debris.
- Intervention effect Conidial suspension produced more damaged kernels than infested kernels.
- Intervention effect Conidial suspension produced more damaged kernels than infested debris.
- Intervention effect Infested kernels and debris did not differ in damaged kernels.