Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plant height, root length and leaf area index were maximal at 60% pressmud compost.

A claim from Agronomical Performance of Upright Hybrid F1 Chili ( Capsicum annuum L.) Fertilized with Sugarcane Pressmud Compost · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, root length and leaf area index were maximal at 60% pressmud compost.

Taxon
C. annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
60% SPMC treatmente0
Outcome
plant height, root length, LAI/plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop yield, plant height, root length, LAI/plant, chlorophyll content of C. annuum and biochemical parameters viz. crude proteins, total dietary fiber, fat, ash, moisture and Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn were recorded maximum at 60% SPMC treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1048
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71

Title

Agronomical Performance of Upright Hybrid F1 Chili ( Capsicum annuum L.) Fertilized with Sugarcane Pressmud Compost

Vinod Kumar Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2026. doi:10.1080/00103624.2026.2622311

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e6e6f5562e4290add53a80f035ed2c4b5ac946726562f6d7dad9776a81e2d46c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 85 positive, 12 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.