Claim · model-written summary
None of the soil samples in IPM fields had insecticide residues.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Twenty per cent of the soil samples in the non-IPM fields had insecticide residues, while none of the soil samples in the IPM fields had residues”
Title
Evaluation of integrated pest management in reducing insecticide residues in plant, soil and water
B Ratna Kumari; G. V. Ranga Rao; K. L. Sahrawat; et al. Indian journal of plant protection 2012
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Tomato fruit samples from IPM fields had insecticide residues in 20% of samples (3 of 15), versus 47% in non-IPM fields.
- Intervention effect Brinjal fields with IPM had insecticide contamination in 20% of samples, versus 47% in non-IPM fields.
- Observation Twenty per cent of soil samples in non-IPM fields had insecticide residues.
- Observation Two of 10 soil samples from non-IPM tomato fields had insecticide residues.
- Observation Water samples from IPM and non-IPM treated fields contained no residues above the detectable level.
- Observation Residue concentrations in crops were below the maximum residue limits (MRLs).
- Association Contamination levels in crops and soils differed substantially between IPM and non-IPM fields.