Claim · model-written summary
Brinjal fields with IPM had insecticide contamination in 20% of samples, versus 47% in non-IPM fields.
- Taxon
- brinjal
Solanum melongenae1 - Treatment
- IPMe1
- Outcome
- insecticide contaminatione1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 20%e1
- Comparator
- non-IPMe1
- Setting
- Ranga Reddy district, Andhra Pradesh, Indiae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The impact of integrated pest management (IPM) in reducing insecticide residues at Kothapally (IPM) and Enkepally (non-IPM) villages of Ranga Reddy district, Andhra Pradesh, India was evaluated in two vegetables (tomato and brinjal)”
e1“In the brinjal fields, 20% of the IPM treated and 47% in non-IPM had insecticide contamination”
Title
Evaluation of integrated pest management in reducing insecticide residues in plant, soil and water
B Ratna Kumari; G. V. Ranga Rao; K. L. Sahrawat; et al. Indian journal of plant protection 2012
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Tomato fruit samples from IPM fields had insecticide residues in 20% of samples (3 of 15), versus 47% in non-IPM fields.
- Observation Twenty per cent of soil samples in non-IPM fields had insecticide residues.
- Observation None of the soil samples in IPM fields had insecticide residues.
- Observation Two of 10 soil samples from non-IPM tomato fields had insecticide residues.
- Observation Water samples from IPM and non-IPM treated fields contained no residues above the detectable level.
- Observation Residue concentrations in crops were below the maximum residue limits (MRLs).
- Association Contamination levels in crops and soils differed substantially between IPM and non-IPM fields.