Paper · 2003 · Bulletin of Entomological Research

Female sex pheromone of brinjal fruit and shoot borer, Leucinodes orbonalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): trap optimization and application in IPM trials

A. Cork; S.N. Alam; F.M.A. Rouf; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Delta and wing traps baited with synthetic female sex pheromone of Leucinodes orbonalis Guenée were found to catch and retain ten times more moths than either Spodoptera or uni-trap designs. Locally-produced water and funnel traps were as effective as delta traps, although 'windows' cut in the side panels of delta traps significantly increased trap catch from 0.4 to 2.3 moths per trap per night. Trap catch was found to be proportional to the radius of sticky disc traps in the range 5-20 cm radius, discs with a 2.5 cm radius caught no moths. Wing traps placed at crop height caught significantly more moths than traps placed 0.5 m above or below the crop canopy. Replicated integrated pest management (IPM) trials (3 x 0.5 ha per treatment) were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops. Farmers applied insecticides at least three times a week in all check and IPM plots. In addition pheromone traps were placed out at a density of 100 per ha and infested shoots removed weekly in the 0.5 ha IPM plots. Pheromone trap catches were reduced significantly from 2.0 to 0.4 moths per trap per night respectively in check and IPM plots in a young crop and 1.1 to 0.3 moths per trap per night in check and IPM plots respectively in a mature crop. Fruit damage was significantly reduced from an average of 41.8% and 51.2% in check plots of young and mature crops respectively to 22% and 26.4 respectively in the associated IPM plots. Significant differences in pheromone trap catches and fruit damage were attained four and two weeks respectively after IPM treatments began in the mature crop whereas in the immature crop significant differences were not observed for the first eight to nine weeks respectively. The relative impact of removing infested shoots and mass trapping on L. orbonalis larval populations was not established in these trials but in both cases there was an estimated increase of approximately 50% in marketable fruit obtained by the combination of control techniques compared to insecticide treatment alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delta and wing traps baited with the synthetic female sex pheromone caught ten times more L. orbonalis moths than Spodoptera or uni-trap designs.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Treatment
Delta and wing traps baited with synthetic female sex pheromonee1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalise1pest
Outcome
mothse1
Direction
moree1
Value
ten timese1
Comparator
Spodoptera or uni-trap designse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Delta and wing traps baited with synthetic female sex pheromone of Leucinodes orbonalis Guenée were found to catch and retain ten times more moths than either Spodoptera or uni-trap designs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–189 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Locally produced water and funnel traps were as effective as delta traps.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Treatment
Locally-produced water and funnel trapse3
Outcome
effectivee3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
delta trapse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Locally-produced water and funnel traps were as effective as delta traps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–263 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap catch was proportional to the radius of sticky disc traps in the 5-20 cm radius range.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Treatment
radius of sticky disc trapse4
Outcome
Trap catche4
Direction
increaseinferrede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Trap catch was found to be proportional to the radius of sticky disc traps in the range 5-20 cm radius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–501 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sticky disc traps with a 2.5 cm radius caught no moths.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Treatment
discs with a 2.5 cm radiuse5
Outcome
caught no mothse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“discs with a 2.5 cm radius caught no moths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–545 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wing traps placed at crop height caught significantly more moths than traps placed 0.5 m above or below the crop canopy.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Treatment
Wing traps placed at crop heighte6
Outcome
mothse6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
traps placed 0.5 m above or below the crop canopye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Wing traps placed at crop height caught significantly more moths than traps placed 0.5 m above or below the crop canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–666 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a young eggplant crop, pheromone trap catches were significantly reduced from 2.0 to 0.4 moths per trap per night in IPM plots compared with check plots.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Organ / stage
young crope7
Treatment
IPM plotse7
Outcome
Pheromone trap catchese7
Direction
reducede7
Value
from 2.0 to 0.4 moths per trap per nighte7
Comparator
checke7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Pheromone trap catches were reduced significantly from 2.0 to 0.4 moths per trap per night respectively in check and IPM plots in a young crop and 1.1 to 0.3 moths per trap per night in check and IPM plots respectively in a mature crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1268 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a mature eggplant crop, pheromone trap catches were significantly reduced from 1.1 to 0.3 moths per trap per night in IPM plots compared with check plots.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Organ / stage
mature crope7
Treatment
IPM plotse7
Outcome
Pheromone trap catchese7
Direction
reducede7
Value
1.1 to 0.3 moths per trap per nighte7
Comparator
checke7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Pheromone trap catches were reduced significantly from 2.0 to 0.4 moths per trap per night respectively in check and IPM plots in a young crop and 1.1 to 0.3 moths per trap per night in check and IPM plots respectively in a mature crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1268 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the young eggplant crop, fruit damage was significantly reduced from 41.8% in check plots to 22% in IPM plots.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Organ / stage
younge3
Treatment
IPM plotse3
Outcome
Fruit damagee3
Direction
reducede3
Value
22%e3
Qualifier
from an average of 41.8%e3
Comparator
check plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Fruit damage was significantly reduced from an average of 41.8% and 51.2% in check plots of young and mature crops respectively to 22% and 26.4 respectively in the associated IPM plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1454 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the mature eggplant crop, fruit damage was significantly reduced from 51.2% in check plots to 26.4 in IPM plots.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Organ / stage
maturee3
Treatment
IPM plotse3
Outcome
Fruit damagee3
Direction
reducede3
Value
26.4e3
Qualifier
51.2%e3
Comparator
check plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Fruit damage was significantly reduced from an average of 41.8% and 51.2% in check plots of young and mature crops respectively to 22% and 26.4 respectively in the associated IPM plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1454 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the mature eggplant crop, significant differences in trap catches and fruit damage appeared four and two weeks respectively after IPM treatments began.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Organ / stage
mature crope4
Treatment
IPM treatmentse4
Outcome
Significant differences in pheromone trap catches and fruit damagee4
Value
four and two weeks respectivelye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Significant differences in pheromone trap catches and fruit damage were attained four and two weeks respectively after IPM treatments began in the mature crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1614 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the immature eggplant crop, significant differences were not observed for the first eight to nine weeks.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Organ / stage
immature crope5
Outcome
significant differencese5
Value
eight to nine weekse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“in the immature crop significant differences were not observed for the first eight to nine weeks respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1732 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining control techniques gave an estimated increase of approximately 50% in marketable fruit compared with insecticide treatment alone.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae2
Treatment
the combination of control techniquese6
Outcome
marketable fruite6
Direction
increasee6
Value
approximately 50%e6
Comparator
insecticide treatment alonee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“there was an estimated increase of approximately 50% in marketable fruit obtained by the combination of control techniques compared to insecticide treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2051 · show in text ↑
e2

“were conducted in farmers fields with young and mature eggplant crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–815 · show in text ↑

ipm · molecular: metabolites · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ipm · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.