Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Straw mulch increased sugar beet root yield by 11.2% versus conventional ploughing.

A claim from The yield and technological quality of sugar beet roots cultivated in mulches · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch increased sugar beet root yield by 11.2% versus conventional ploughing.

Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.2%e0
Comparator
conventional ploughinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Replacing conventional ploughing with mustard mulch caused 9.4% root yield increase and with straw mulch 11.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–443
t0

“The yield and technological quality of sugar beet roots cultivated in mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77

Title

The yield and technological quality of sugar beet roots cultivated in mulches

A. Artyszak; D. Gozdowski; K. Kucińska Plant Soil and Environment 2014. doi:10.17221/428/2014-pse

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e6f316c6c79b9a6ea67d767e4cdbdc44d12632981f26731fa9431477ccff7eba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.