Abstract
Purpose. To find out the dependence of sugar beet and barley productivity in short crop rotations on organo-mineral fertilizer system and soil tillage with the use of manure and harvest residues (straw of cereals and sugar beet tops).Methods. Field, laboratory, and statistical.Results. The study was carried out in the area of insufficient soil moisture of the Left Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine on the slightly saline chernozem in a long-term stationary experiment in the following short crop rotations: crop rotation system esparcet + Festuca pratensis and grain-hoed crop rotation in the link with bare fallow with the 25 % share of sugar beet. Fertilization for the experiment was organo-mineral, both in crop rotation and under sugar beet. Barley was grown after sugar beet against the background of the aftereffect of fertilizers applied to sugar beet. The ploughing of harvest residues of all the crops of the rotation into the soil against the background of mineral fertilization was not inferior to the use of manure and mineral fertilization system by the effect on the sugar beet and barley yields.Conclusions. Under the application of 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90, in the crop rotatory system, root yield and sugar yields were 37.6 and 6.56 t/ha, respectively. To compare, in grain-hoed crop rotation, these values were 38.3 and 6.62 t/ha, respectively. When ploughing the crop residues of all crops in the rotation into the soil + N90P90K90, root yield in both crop rotation systems was at the level of the treatment 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90. Sugar beet productivity under the combined tillage in the grain-hoed crop rotation and all fertilization systems was not inferior to ploughing. Under the application of 25 t/ha of manure + straw in both crop rotation systems, root yield was 36.4 and 34.2 t/ha, respectively, and sugar yield was 6.13 and 5.81 t/ha, respectively. Barley yield in both crop rotation systems under the aftereffect of fertilizers applied to sugar beet + straw + N90P90K90 had advantages in the link with bare fallow compared to the link esparcet + Festuca pratensis. Barley yield under the combined soil tillage was not inferior to ploughing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Residue ploughing with mineral fertilizer was not inferior to manure with mineral fertilizer for sugar beet yield.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- ploughing of harvest residues of all the crops of the rotation into the soil against the background of mineral fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- sugar beet and barley yieldse0
- Direction
- not inferiore0
- Comparator
- use of manure and mineral fertilization systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The ploughing of harvest residues of all the crops of the rotation into the soil against the background of mineral fertilization was not inferior to the use of manure and mineral fertilization system by the effect on the sugar beet and barley yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residue ploughing with mineral fertilizer was not inferior to manure with mineral fertilizer for barley yield.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- ploughing of harvest residues of all the crops of the rotation into the soil against the background of mineral fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- barley yieldse0
- Direction
- not inferiore0
- Comparator
- use of manure and mineral fertilization systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The ploughing of harvest residues of all the crops of the rotation into the soil against the background of mineral fertilization was not inferior to the use of manure and mineral fertilization system by the effect on the sugar beet and barley yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
With manure and NPK, root yield in crop rotatory system was 37.6 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90e0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Value
- 37.6e0
- Setting
- crop rotatory systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“Under the application of 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90, in the crop rotatory system, root yield and sugar yields were 37.6 and 6.56 t/ha, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
With manure and NPK, sugar yield in crop rotatory system was 6.56 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90e0
- Outcome
- sugar yieldse0
- Value
- 6.56 t/hae0
- Setting
- crop rotatory systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“Under the application of 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90, in the crop rotatory system, root yield and sugar yields were 37.6 and 6.56 t/ha, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
With manure and NPK, root yield in grain-hoed rotation was 38.3 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- root yielde1
- Value
- 38.3e0
- Setting
- grain-hoed crop rotatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“To compare, in grain-hoed crop rotation, these values were 38.3 and 6.62 t/ha, respectively.”
e1“root yield and sugar yields”
Claim · model-written summary
With manure and NPK, sugar yield in grain-hoed rotation was 6.62 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- sugar yieldse1
- Value
- 6.62 t/hae0
- Setting
- grain-hoed crop rotatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“To compare, in grain-hoed crop rotation, these values were 38.3 and 6.62 t/ha, respectively.”
e1“root yield and sugar yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Residue ploughing plus NPK produced root yield comparable to manure plus NPK in both rotations.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- ploughing the crop residues of all crops in the rotation into the soil + N90P90K90e0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- at the levele0
- Comparator
- 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“When ploughing the crop residues of all crops in the rotation into the soil + N90P90K90, root yield in both crop rotation systems was at the level of the treatment 25 t/ha of manure + N90P90K90.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined tillage was not inferior to ploughing for sugar beet productivity in the grain-hoed rotation.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- combined tillagee0
- Outcome
- Sugar beet productivitye0
- Direction
- not inferiore0
- Comparator
- ploughinge0
- Setting
- grain-hoed crop rotatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet productivity under the combined tillage in the grain-hoed crop rotation and all fertilization systems was not inferior to ploughing.”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure plus straw yielded 36.4 t/ha of roots in the first rotation.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 25 t/ha of manure + strawe0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Value
- 36.4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“Under the application of 25 t/ha of manure + straw in both crop rotation systems, root yield was 36.4 and 34.2 t/ha, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure plus straw yielded 34.2 t/ha of roots in the second rotation.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 25 t/ha of manure + strawe0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Value
- 34.2 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“Under the application of 25 t/ha of manure + straw in both crop rotation systems, root yield was 36.4 and 34.2 t/ha, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure plus straw gave 6.13 t/ha sugar yield in the first rotation.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 25 t/ha of manure + strawe1
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Value
- 6.13e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“sugar yield was 6.13 and 5.81 t/ha, respectively”
e1“25 t/ha of manure + straw”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure plus straw gave 5.81 t/ha sugar yield in the second rotation.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 25 t/ha of manure + strawe1
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Value
- 5.81 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“sugar yield was 6.13 and 5.81 t/ha, respectively”
e1“25 t/ha of manure + straw”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley yield under fertilizer aftereffects was higher in the bare-fallow link than in the esparcet–Festuca link.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- aftereffect of fertilizers applied to sugar beet + straw + N90P90K90e0
- Outcome
- Barley yielde0
- Direction
- had advantagese0
- Comparator
- link esparcet + Festuca pratensise0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Barley yield in both crop rotation systems under the aftereffect of fertilizers applied to sugar beet + straw + N90P90K90 had advantages in the link with bare fallow compared to the link esparcet + Festuca pratensis.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil tillage was not inferior to ploughing for barley yield.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- combined soil tillagee0
- Outcome
- Barley yielde0
- Direction
- not inferiore0
- Comparator
- ploughinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Barley yield under the combined soil tillage was not inferior to ploughing.”
The same questions in other papers
organic · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →rotation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →rotation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →tillage · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 105 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 237 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 473 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.