Claim · model-written summary
Drought slightly significantly decreased relative water content in C2.
- Taxon
- Ae. crassae0
- Material
- C2e0
- Treatment
- drought treatmente0
- Outcome
- relative water content (RWC)e0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“At the end of drought treatment, a slightly significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) was shown in two Ae. crassa accessions (C2 and C3)”
t0“Controlled Drought”
Title
Amal M. Harb; Jamil N. Lahham Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences 2013. doi:10.12816/0000273
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Drought slightly significantly decreased relative water content in C3.
- Intervention effect C1 relative water content did not change under drought.
- Intervention effect Durum wheat relative water content did not change under drought.
- Intervention effect Drought had minimal effect on chlorophyll content in all Aegilops accessions and durum wheat.
- Intervention effect Drought had minimal effect on chlorophyll fluorescence in all Aegilops accessions and durum wheat.
- Intervention effect Drought did not significantly change C2 biomass.
- Intervention effect Drought did not significantly change C3 biomass.
- Intervention effect Drought significantly decreased C1 biomass.
- Intervention effect Drought highly significantly decreased durum wheat biomass.
- Recommendation The authors identify C2 and C3 as promising sources for engineering drought tolerant wheat.