Intervention effectmodel-written summary

150% P2O5 enriched pressmud gave higher pod yield.

A claim from Enriched sources of plant nutrients and different levels of phosphorus on sustained cowpea production in Typic Haplusterts soil · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150% P2O5 enriched pressmud gave higher pod yield.

Treatment
150% P2O5 enriched pressmud (EPM)e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% P2O5 enriched pressmud (EPM) resulted in higher pod yield, P uptake, soil available P and organic carbon content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–979
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90

Title

Enriched sources of plant nutrients and different levels of phosphorus on sustained cowpea production in Typic Haplusterts soil

S. Srinivasan; A. Angayarkanni; S. Anbarasu Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e7a7e1451b1a597c27b329fc4d9e8c4d4addb14111c81d64e65fbe2a72d95506 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Potassium and phosphorus rates showed no interaction effect on grain yield.

    Liming, fertilization, and rhizobia inoculation on cowpea yield in a Brazilian Amazon upland forest environment · 2021

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Phosphorus level had no significant effect on stem girth, plant height or 100 seed weight.

    Effect of different phosphorus levels on four cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp L.) varieties for grain and fodder yield in Upper East Region of Ghana · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Cowpea yield with P was 0.01 Mg/ha, against 0.13 Mg/ha without P, as written.

    Crop Response to Lime and Phosphorus on New Bench Terraces in the Tropics · 1990 · compared with no‐P

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Phosphorus fertilizer and row spacing did not significantly influence grain number per pod.

    Responses of Cowpea to Phosphorous Application Rates and Row Spacing in the Sudan Savanna Zone of Nigeria · 2020

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Phosphorus application had no significant effect on crop yield.

    Effect of density of acacia and phosphorus fertilization on yield and water expense efficiency of rainfed cowpea in arid environment · 2005

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Calcined Burkina phosphate rock (CPR) showed no superiority over non-calcined Burkina phosphate rock (BPR) for grain production.

    Effect of calcined/non-calcined phosphate rock application on crop yield and phosphorus availability to replace commercial fertilizer on a lixisol in Burkina Faso · 2025 · compared with BPR

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Phosphorus alone consistently increased cowpea grain yield across locations.

    Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea to Inoculation and Phosphorus Fertilization in Different Environments · 2017

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Applied phosphorus significantly improved pods per plant in cowpea, with the highest response at 60 kg.P.ha–1.

    Influence of phosphorus on the performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.) varieties in the Sudan savanna of Nigeria · 2011

    Same direction

104 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.