Paper · 2021 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira

Liming, fertilization, and rhizobia inoculation on cowpea yield in a Brazilian Amazon upland forest environment

Wardsson Lustrino Borges; Natália dos Santos Ferreira; Rayane da Mota Rios; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this work was to evaluate the response of the BRS Tumucumaque cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) cultivar to liming and to phosphorus and potassium fertilization in the absence of inoculation or nitrogen fertilization, as well as to inoculation with selected Bradyrhizobium strains, in an upland forest area in the state of Amapá, eastern Amazon, Brazil. Seven experiments were conducted in field conditions, in order to evaluate six limestone, four phosphorus, and four potassium rates, besides the inoculation with four Bradyrhizobium strains. Leaf nitrogen concentrations, pod and grain dry mass per plant, grain yield, and soil pH, Al+3, and Ca+2 + Mg+2 were evaluated. The obtained data were subjected to the analysis of variance, to the regression analysis, or to test to compare means. The soil presented a high buffer power, but liming reduced its chemical limitations. Leaf nitrogen concentrations were correlated to cowpea grain yield. However, there is no effect of the interaction between potassium and phosphorus rates on grain yield. In addition, grain yield is not influenced by liming and potassium fertilization, but is increased by phosphorus fertilization. Inoculation with the UFLA 3-84 and INPA 03-11B strains promotes a greater grain yield than that with BR 3262 and BR 3267, as well as a similar grain yield to that of the control without inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming reduced soil chemical limitations.

Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
chemical limitationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“liming reduced its chemical limitations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen concentrations correlated with cowpea grain yield.

Compound
nitrogene0
Outcome
cowpea grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen concentrations were correlated to cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and phosphorus rates showed no interaction effect on grain yield.

Treatment
interaction between potassium and phosphorus ratese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no effect of the interaction between potassium and phosphorus rates on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming did not influence grain yield.

Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield is not influenced by liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization did not influence grain yield.

Treatment
potassium fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield is not influenced by liming and potassium fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization increased grain yield.

Treatment
phosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield is not influenced by liming and potassium fertilization, but is increased by phosphorus fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UFLA 3-84 inoculation produced greater grain yield than BR 3262 and BR 3267 inoculation.

Treatment
UFLA 3-84e0
Interactor
UFLA 3-84e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
BR 3262 and BR 3267e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with the UFLA 3-84 and INPA 03-11B strains promotes a greater grain yield than that with BR 3262 and BR 3267”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INPA 03-11B inoculation produced greater grain yield than BR 3262 and BR 3267 inoculation.

Treatment
INPA 03-11Be0
Interactor
INPA 03-11Be0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
BR 3262 and BR 3267e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with the UFLA 3-84 and INPA 03-11B strains promotes a greater grain yield than that with BR 3262 and BR 3267”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UFLA 3-84 inoculation gave grain yield similar to uninoculated controls.

Treatment
UFLA 3-84e0
Interactor
UFLA 3-84e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control without inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with the UFLA 3-84 and INPA 03-11B strains promotes a greater grain yield than that with BR 3262 and BR 3267, as well as a similar grain yield to that of the control without inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INPA 03-11B inoculation gave grain yield similar to uninoculated controls.

Treatment
INPA 03-11Be0
Interactor
INPA 03-11Be0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control without inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with the UFLA 3-84 and INPA 03-11B strains promotes a greater grain yield than that with BR 3262 and BR 3267, as well as a similar grain yield to that of the control without inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

lime · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.