Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Interaction of liming, mineral nitrogen fertilization, and Rhizobium inoculation in biomass partitioning and production of cowpea

Milton Garcia Costa; Eric Victor de Oliveira Ferreira; Adan Andrade de Souza; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Cowpea has great capacity of biological fixation of nitrogen (BFN) in association with Rhizobium. However, it is not known whether the interaction of liming, mineral N fertilization, and Rhizobium-inoculated seeds can modify the efficiency of BFN, and still, result in gains in biomass production and yield in cowpea. This study evaluated the use of liming associated to Rhizobium-inoculated seeds and supplemental mineral N fertilization on the nodulation improvement, biomass production, and on the increase of cowpea grain production. Two experiments were conducted under field conditions in two consecutive years, using the same treatments and experimental design. The treatments were conditioned in a split-plot scheme in randomized blocks with four replications in a 2 × 6 factorial, the first factor being two cowpea cultivars (BRS Tapaihum and BRS Marataoã) and the second factor was considered six conditions of corrective practice and N supply [no N supply and no liming (T1), liming + rhizobium (T2), rhizobium (T3), liming + mineral N (T4), liming (T5), and liming + mineral N + rhizobium (T6)]. Nitrogen concentration and accumulation in the leaves increased with liming and N supply (T2, T4, and T6) and increased dry matter (DM) accumulation in the stem, leaves, shoots, and total DM. The absence of liming limited root length growth, decreased root DM, and the number and DM of nodules thus limiting grain production. Additionally, N fertilization supplemented with Rhizobium-inoculated seeds did not increase grain production. However, the use of liming and the inoculation of seeds with Rhizobium increased plant performance and improved grain yield of both cowpea cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming and nitrogen supply increased leaf nitrogen concentration and accumulation in cowpea.

Treatment
liming and N supplye0
Outcome
Nitrogen concentration and accumulation in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentration and accumulation in the leaves increased with liming and N supply (T2, T4, and T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming and nitrogen supply increased cowpea dry matter accumulation in stems, leaves, shoots and total biomass.

Treatment
liming and N supplye0
Outcome
dry matter (DM) accumulation in the stem, leaves, shoots, and total DMe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentration and accumulation in the leaves increased with liming and N supply (T2, T4, and T6) and increased dry matter (DM) accumulation in the stem, leaves, shoots, and total DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absence of liming limited cowpea root length growth.

Treatment
absence of liminge0
Outcome
root length growthe0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absence of liming limited root length growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absence of liming decreased cowpea root dry matter.

Treatment
absence of liminge0
Outcome
root DMe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absence of liming limited root length growth, decreased root DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absence of liming decreased cowpea nodule number and dry matter.

Treatment
absence of liminge0
Outcome
number and DM of nodulese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absence of liming limited root length growth, decreased root DM, and the number and DM of nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absence of liming limited cowpea grain production.

Treatment
absence of liminge0
Outcome
grain productione0
Direction
limitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absence of liming limited root length growth, decreased root DM, and the number and DM of nodules thus limiting grain production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization with Rhizobium inoculation did not increase cowpea grain production.

Treatment
N fertilization supplemented with Rhizobium-inoculated seedse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain productione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization supplemented with Rhizobium-inoculated seeds did not increase grain production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming and Rhizobium seed inoculation increased cowpea plant performance.

Treatment
the use of liming and the inoculation of seeds with Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
plant performancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of liming and the inoculation of seeds with Rhizobium increased plant performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming and Rhizobium seed inoculation improved grain yield in both cowpea cultivars.

Treatment
the use of liming and the inoculation of seeds with Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both cowpea cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of liming and the inoculation of seeds with Rhizobium increased plant performance and improved grain yield of both cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–129 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

47 papers: 47 positive, 0 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

lime · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 39 positive, 6 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 275 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

lime · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.