lime · Growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)

Results agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

How these papers cite each other

1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20082010201220142016201820202022
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 9

  1. Effect of a bio-extract solution from water convolvulus and gypsum on yield and quality of yardlong bean seed · 2007

  2. ABSORÇÃO DE NUTRIENTES E SÓDIO PELO CAUPI EM SOLOS SALINO-SÓDICOS CORRIGIDOS COM GESSO · 2008

  3. Growth of cowpea plants inoculated with Rhizobium in a saline-sodic soil after application of gypsum · 2014

  4. Cowpea yield on soils with residues of NPK and natural phosphate fertilizers in succession the area of degraded pasture · 2016

  5. Performance of cowpea as influenced by native strain of rhizobia, lime and phosphorus in Samaru, Nigeria · 2017

    cited by 1 paper here

  6. Effect of treated effluent from beverage industry irrigation on growth and yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize: Cowpea cropping sequence · 2020

  7. Amelioration Effect of Soil Amendment on Growth and Yield of Vigna unguiculata L. Grown in Acidic and Alkaline Soils · 2021

  8. Effect of treated effluent from beverage industry irrigation on growth and yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize: Cowpea cropping sequence · 2021

  9. Interaction of liming, mineral nitrogen fertilization, and Rhizobium inoculation in biomass partitioning and production of cowpea · 2023

    cites 1 paper here

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

lime on Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) against other targets

lime · growth on other organisms