Intervention effectmodel-written summary

OM and AL significantly increased net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio.

A claim from Amelioration Effect of Soil Amendment on Growth and Yield of Vigna unguiculata L. Grown in Acidic and Alkaline Soils · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OM and AL significantly increased net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio.

Taxon
V. unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
OM and ALe0
Outcome
net assimilation rate and leaf area ratioe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed significant (P=0.05) increase in leaf area, plant height, number of leaves, leaf fresh and leaf dry weight, relative growth rate, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio of V. unguiculata grown in acidic and alkaline soils treated with OM and AL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1070

Title

Amelioration Effect of Soil Amendment on Growth and Yield of Vigna unguiculata L. Grown in Acidic and Alkaline Soils

A. A. J. Mofunanya; E. A. Effa; I. R. Udosen Annual Research & Review in Biology 2021. doi:10.9734/arrb/2021/v36i630390

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-ff23cc4c2a69f58f35803711f94bd3f2fa204d64494e14c2d047f406df064343 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 131 positive, 12 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

134 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

lime · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.