Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in the premises of coca cola Pvt. Ltd., near Bidadi, Ramanagara district of Karnataka during 2017-18 to study the effect of beverage industry effluent on soil properties, growth and yield of maize with ten treatments replicated thrice using RCBD design. The beverage industry effluent was slightly alkaline in pH (8.21 ±0.20). Electrical conductivity was medium (1.75± 0.14 dS m-1), BOD (5.23± 0.36 mg L-1) and COD (20.44 ± 1.07 mg L-1) and TSS (152.90 ± 0.21 mg L-1) but low in plant nutrient content. Among the plant parameters in residual cowpea crop higher plant height (45.44 cm), No of branches plant-1 (10.00), seed and haulm yield (1023.33 kg ha-1and 2411.86 kg ha-1, respectively) were significantly higher in the treatment receiving irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T7) compared to all other treatments. Significantly lower plant height (38.91 cm), No of branches plant-1 (8.56), seed and haulm yield (876.14 kg ha-1and 2064.95 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded in treatment received irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum (T2).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height of cowpea was significantly higher under beverage industry effluent with RDF and gypsum than under all other treatments.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 45.44 cme1
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e1“Among the plant parameters in residual cowpea crop higher plant height (45.44 cm), No of branches plant-1 (10.00), seed and haulm yield (1023.33 kg ha-1and 2411.86 kg ha-1, respectively) were significantly higher in the treatment receiving irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T7) compared to all other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of cowpea branches per plant was significantly higher under beverage industry effluent with RDF and gypsum than under all other treatments.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume1
- Outcome
- No of branches plant-1e1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 10.00e1
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e1“Among the plant parameters in residual cowpea crop higher plant height (45.44 cm), No of branches plant-1 (10.00), seed and haulm yield (1023.33 kg ha-1and 2411.86 kg ha-1, respectively) were significantly higher in the treatment receiving irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T7) compared to all other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield of cowpea was significantly higher under beverage industry effluent with RDF and gypsum than under all other treatments.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume1
- Outcome
- seed and haulm yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1023.33 kg ha-1e1
- Qualifier
- seede1
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e1“Among the plant parameters in residual cowpea crop higher plant height (45.44 cm), No of branches plant-1 (10.00), seed and haulm yield (1023.33 kg ha-1and 2411.86 kg ha-1, respectively) were significantly higher in the treatment receiving irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T7) compared to all other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Haulm yield of cowpea was significantly higher under beverage industry effluent with RDF and gypsum than under all other treatments.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume1
- Outcome
- seed and haulm yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 2411.86 kg ha-1e1
- Qualifier
- haulme1
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e1“Among the plant parameters in residual cowpea crop higher plant height (45.44 cm), No of branches plant-1 (10.00), seed and haulm yield (1023.33 kg ha-1and 2411.86 kg ha-1, respectively) were significantly higher in the treatment receiving irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T7) compared to all other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height of cowpea was significantly lower under beverage industry effluent with RDF but without gypsum.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsume2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- Significantly lowere2
- Value
- 38.91 cme2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e2“Significantly lower plant height (38.91 cm), No of branches plant-1 (8.56), seed and haulm yield (876.14 kg ha-1and 2064.95 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded in treatment received irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum (T2)”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of cowpea branches per plant was significantly lower under beverage industry effluent with RDF but without gypsum.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsume2
- Outcome
- No of branches plant-1e2
- Direction
- Significantly lowere2
- Value
- 8.56e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e2“Significantly lower plant height (38.91 cm), No of branches plant-1 (8.56), seed and haulm yield (876.14 kg ha-1and 2064.95 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded in treatment received irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum (T2)”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield of cowpea was significantly lower under beverage industry effluent with RDF but without gypsum.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsume2
- Outcome
- seed and haulm yielde2
- Direction
- Significantly lowere2
- Value
- 876.14 kg ha-1e2
- Qualifier
- seede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e2“Significantly lower plant height (38.91 cm), No of branches plant-1 (8.56), seed and haulm yield (876.14 kg ha-1and 2064.95 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded in treatment received irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum (T2)”
Claim · model-written summary
Haulm yield of cowpea was significantly lower under beverage industry effluent with RDF but without gypsum.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsume2
- Outcome
- seed and haulm yielde2
- Direction
- Significantly lowere2
- Value
- 2064.95 kg ha-1e2
- Qualifier
- haulme2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize”
e2“Significantly lower plant height (38.91 cm), No of branches plant-1 (8.56), seed and haulm yield (876.14 kg ha-1and 2064.95 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded in treatment received irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum (T2)”
Claim · model-written summary
The beverage industry effluent had a slightly alkaline pH of 8.21 ±0.20.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e3“The beverage industry effluent was slightly alkaline in pH (8.21 ±0.20). Electrical conductivity was medium (1.75± 0.14 dS m-1), BOD (5.23± 0.36 mg L-1) and COD (20.44 ± 1.07 mg L-1) and TSS (152.90 ± 0.21 mg L-1) but low in plant nutrient content.”
Claim · model-written summary
The beverage industry effluent had an electrical conductivity of 1.75 ±0.14 dS m-1, which was medium.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e3“The beverage industry effluent was slightly alkaline in pH (8.21 ±0.20). Electrical conductivity was medium (1.75± 0.14 dS m-1), BOD (5.23± 0.36 mg L-1) and COD (20.44 ± 1.07 mg L-1) and TSS (152.90 ± 0.21 mg L-1) but low in plant nutrient content.”
Claim · model-written summary
The beverage industry effluent had a BOD of 5.23 ±0.36 mg L-1.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e3“The beverage industry effluent was slightly alkaline in pH (8.21 ±0.20). Electrical conductivity was medium (1.75± 0.14 dS m-1), BOD (5.23± 0.36 mg L-1) and COD (20.44 ± 1.07 mg L-1) and TSS (152.90 ± 0.21 mg L-1) but low in plant nutrient content.”
Claim · model-written summary
The beverage industry effluent had a COD of 20.44 ±1.07 mg L-1.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e3“The beverage industry effluent was slightly alkaline in pH (8.21 ±0.20). Electrical conductivity was medium (1.75± 0.14 dS m-1), BOD (5.23± 0.36 mg L-1) and COD (20.44 ± 1.07 mg L-1) and TSS (152.90 ± 0.21 mg L-1) but low in plant nutrient content.”
Claim · model-written summary
The beverage industry effluent had a TSS of 152.90 ±0.21 mg L-1.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e3“The beverage industry effluent was slightly alkaline in pH (8.21 ±0.20). Electrical conductivity was medium (1.75± 0.14 dS m-1), BOD (5.23± 0.36 mg L-1) and COD (20.44 ± 1.07 mg L-1) and TSS (152.90 ± 0.21 mg L-1) but low in plant nutrient content.”
The same questions in other papers
lime · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
139 papers more in this group
See all 143 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
288 papers more in this group
See all 292 papers →lime · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.