Abstract
The alarming increase of utilization of chemical fertilizers for crops has stimulated the quest for organic residues with the potential for enhancing agricultural products. The manipueira is a liquid residue produced in the process of making flour or starch from cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.) with potential for use as agricultural fertilizers because of its rich macronutrient (K, N, Mg, P, Ca and S, in the quantitative order) content and with sufficient contents of all micronutrients except molybdenum. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the initial development of cowpea bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., cv. Corujinha) fertilized with mineral fertilization and manipueira. The research was performed between January and February 2017, in a greenhouse located in the city of Campina Grande (7 13'50" S, 35 52'52" W, 551 m asl), state of Paraba, Brazil. The experimental design was completely randomized, involving 8 treatments and 3 replicates, totally 24 experimental units. The treatments included applying mineral fertilization using phosphorus; potassium; phosphorus and potassium in combination; organo-mineral fertilization with phosphorus and manipueira; and phosphorus combined with manipueira in different proportions (25, 50, 75 and 100 % of the manipueira recommended doses). Stem diameter, plant height, number of leaves, fresh shoot biomass and dry biomass of the aerial parts of the plant, fresh root biomass and dry root biomass were determined at 15 days after sowing. Data were subjected to the analysis of variance by F-test and the averages were compared by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). The results showed significant differences between the treatments evaluated. The most significant increases in bean growth and phytomass accumulation were occurred upon mineral fertilization with phosphorus on stem diameter, plant height, fresh shoot biomass and fresh and dry root biomass. Plants subjected to fertilization with phosphorus and different doses of manipueira exhibited a negative effect on the initial development stage of the cowpea (V4 stage) and it is not recommended as a substitute for the mineral fertilization for this culture in this period.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilization with phosphorus gave the most significant increases in stem diameter, plant height and fresh shoot biomass of cowpea in a greenhouse.
Verbatim
e0“The research was performed between January and February 2017, in a greenhouse located in the city of Campina Grande”
e1“evaluate the initial development of cowpea bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., cv. Corujinha)”
e2“The most significant increases in bean growth and phytomass accumulation were occurred upon mineral fertilization with phosphorus on stem diameter, plant height, fresh shoot biomass and fresh and dry root biomass”
e3“The results showed significant differences between the treatments evaluated”
e4“were determined at 15 days after sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilization with phosphorus gave the most significant increase in fresh and dry root biomass of cowpea in a greenhouse.
Verbatim
e0“The research was performed between January and February 2017, in a greenhouse located in the city of Campina Grande”
e1“evaluate the initial development of cowpea bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., cv. Corujinha)”
e2“The most significant increases in bean growth and phytomass accumulation were occurred upon mineral fertilization with phosphorus on stem diameter, plant height, fresh shoot biomass and fresh and dry root biomass”
e3“The results showed significant differences between the treatments evaluated”
e4“were determined at 15 days after sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus combined with different doses of manipueira had a negative effect on the initial development (V4 stage) of cowpea in a greenhouse, relative to mineral fertilization.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae5 - Organ / stage
- V4 stagee5
- Treatment
- fertilization with phosphorus and different doses of manipueirae5
- Outcome
- initial development stagee5
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede5
- Qualifier
- in this periode5
- Comparator
- mineral fertilizatione5
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The research was performed between January and February 2017, in a greenhouse located in the city of Campina Grande”
e5“Plants subjected to fertilization with phosphorus and different doses of manipueira exhibited a negative effect on the initial development stage of the cowpea (V4 stage) and it is not recommended as a substitute for the mineral fertilization for this culture in this period”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors do not recommend manipueira as a substitute for mineral fertilization for cowpea in this period.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae5
- Outcome
- substitute for the mineral fertilizatione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Plants subjected to fertilization with phosphorus and different doses of manipueira exhibited a negative effect on the initial development stage of the cowpea (V4 stage) and it is not recommended as a substitute for the mineral fertilization for this culture in this period”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
139 papers more in this group
See all 143 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.