Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Phosphorus Response Efficiency in Cowpea Genotypes

Oladiran Olaleye; Fagbola Olajire; Abaidoo Robert C.; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorus is important for cowpea production and is inherently low in many tropical soils. Selection of cowpea genotypes that produce good yield under low soil P or those with high P response efficiency can be a low input approach in solving this problem. Therefore, the effect of root architecture and P application on the yield of cowpea and its P uptake were investigated. A screen house experiment was conducted at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria. Three hundred cowpea genotypes obtained from the germplasm collection Unit of IITA were screened for number of root whorls and total number of roots using a completely randomized design with 12 replicates. Ten cowpea genotypes were further selected from the initial screening to determine the effect of three levels of P (0, 20 and 40 mg P kg-1 soil) application on their growth and nutrient uptake. The experiment was replicated three times. Phosphorus application significantly (p<0.05) enhanced shoot and root dry weight, total biomass, number of nodules, nodules dry weight, N and P uptake of the cowpea genotypes investigated. Six cowpea genotypes exhibited increases in nodules dry weight with P application. There was no significant relationship between root architecture and P uptake (r = -0.13). The N and P uptake were enhanced by the application of P in the cowpea genotypes studied. In low P soil, IT97K-414-5 was efficient in P uptake and IT92KD-267-2 was efficient in N uptake. The two genotypes may produce cowpea lines suitable in low P soils when used as breeder lines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application significantly enhanced shoot and root dry weight and total biomass of cowpea genotypes.

Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weight, total biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0
Setting
screen housee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application significantly (p<0.05) enhanced shoot and root dry weight, total biomass, number of nodules, nodules dry weight, N and P uptake of the cowpea genotypes investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e5

“A screen house experiment was conducted at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application significantly enhanced the number of nodules and nodules dry weight of cowpea genotypes.

Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
number of nodules, nodules dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Setting
screen housee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application significantly (p<0.05) enhanced shoot and root dry weight, total biomass, number of nodules, nodules dry weight, N and P uptake of the cowpea genotypes investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e5

“A screen house experiment was conducted at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application significantly enhanced N and P uptake of cowpea genotypes.

Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
N and P uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Setting
screen housee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application significantly (p<0.05) enhanced shoot and root dry weight, total biomass, number of nodules, nodules dry weight, N and P uptake of the cowpea genotypes investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e5

“A screen house experiment was conducted at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six cowpea genotypes showed increases in nodules dry weight with P application.

Treatment
P applicatione1
Outcome
nodules dry weighte1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
Six cowpea genotypese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Six cowpea genotypes exhibited increases in nodules dry weight with P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1209 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no significant relationship between root architecture and P uptake in cowpea.

Organ / stage
root architecturee2
Outcome
P uptakee2
Value
r = -0.13e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application significantly (p<0.05) enhanced shoot and root dry weight, total biomass, number of nodules, nodules dry weight, N and P uptake of the cowpea genotypes investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no significant relationship between root architecture and P uptake (r = -0.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotype IT97K-414-5 was efficient in P uptake in low P soil.

Material
IT97K-414-5e3
Outcome
efficient in P uptakee3
Qualifier
In low P soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application significantly (p<0.05) enhanced shoot and root dry weight, total biomass, number of nodules, nodules dry weight, N and P uptake of the cowpea genotypes investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e3

“In low P soil, IT97K-414-5 was efficient in P uptake and IT92KD-267-2 was efficient in N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotype IT92KD-267-2 was efficient in N uptake in low P soil.

Material
IT92KD-267-2e3
Outcome
efficient in N uptakee3
Qualifier
In low P soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application significantly (p<0.05) enhanced shoot and root dry weight, total biomass, number of nodules, nodules dry weight, N and P uptake of the cowpea genotypes investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e3

“In low P soil, IT97K-414-5 was efficient in P uptake and IT92KD-267-2 was efficient in N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The two selected genotypes may produce cowpea lines suitable in low P soils when used as breeder lines.

Outcome
cowpea lines suitable in low P soilse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The two genotypes may produce cowpea lines suitable in low P soils when used as breeder lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1581 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

56 papers: 52 positive, 4 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.